How Infinite Banking Policies Are Actually Built: Base Policies, Blended Designs, and Strategic Riders
Understanding the components, death benefit structures, and policy riders that distinguish properly designed infinite banking systems from traditional insurance.
Product identification: this page discusses participating whole life insurance. It is insurance, not a bank account or investment.
We are not a bank: “The Infinite Banker” is an education brand. We do not accept deposits, and we do not offer FDIC- or NCUA-insured products.
Guaranteed vs non-guaranteed: dividends and other non-guaranteed elements are not guaranteed and may change. Any values shown that include non-guaranteed elements are for education only.
Why Policy Design Determines Everything
Two people might both purchase “whole life insurance” from the same company with identical annual premium commitments and similar health ratings, yet after 15 years find themselves in completely different financial positions. One has accessible cash value of $275,000 on $225,000 in premiums paid—a robust banking system ready for deployment. The other has cash value of $180,000 on the same $225,000 in premiums—barely ahead of premiums paid and years away from functioning as an efficient capital source.
The difference isn’t company performance, market conditions, or luck. It’s policy design—how the components were structured, which riders were included, how premium allocations were optimized, and whether the policy was built for death benefit protection or cash value accumulation.
Traditional whole life insurance sold for death benefit purposes allocates most premium dollars to insurance coverage with modest cash value growth as a secondary benefit. These policies provide excellent family protection but terrible infinite banking efficiency. The insurance costs consume too much premium, leaving insufficient allocation for rapid cash value building.
Infinite banking policies flip the priority: maximize cash value accumulation while maintaining minimum death benefit required for tax qualification and family protection. This requires understanding five structural components and how they integrate creating systems optimized for capital storage and access rather than insurance protection alone.
Most insurance agents don’t understand this distinction. They’ve sold whole life insurance the same way for decades—focus on death benefit needs, run income replacement calculations, recommend coverage multiples of salary, and design policies optimizing death benefit per premium dollar. When these agents encounter infinite banking, they often design policies using traditional frameworks creating suboptimal results.
Properly designed infinite banking policies share specific architectural characteristics: modest base whole life death benefit establishing guaranteed foundation and tax-qualified structure, aggressive paid-up additions riders directing maximum premium dollars into immediate cash value accumulation, strategic term insurance riders increasing total death benefit to support higher premium payments without MEC violations, and carefully selected optional riders protecting the system during disability or providing other strategic benefits.
Understanding how these components work individually and integrate into optimized systems is what separates people who build efficient banking systems from those who buy expensive insurance policies generating mediocre results.
Base Policy: The Foundation Structure
The base policy represents the foundational whole life insurance contract providing guaranteed death benefit, guaranteed cash value growth schedule, and the structure onto which paid-up additions riders and other enhancements attach. Understanding base policy mechanics clarifies why infinite banking policies include them but don’t emphasize them the way traditional insurance marketing does.
The base policy establishes permanent contractual guarantees the insurance company cannot change regardless of market performance, company financial results, or economic conditions: minimum death benefit (the coverage amount shown on your policy face page), minimum cash value schedule (the guaranteed accumulation even if dividends go to zero), maximum premium (the level payment required to maintain guaranteed benefits), guaranteed interest rate (the minimum growth rate on guaranteed cash value, typically 3-4%), and policy structure and terms (all contractual rights, obligations, and provisions).
These guarantees provide the floor below which your policy can never fall. Even if the insurance company’s dividend scale drops to zero, market crashes destroy investment portfolios, or economic depression creates financial chaos, your base policy guarantees remain intact. This certainty distinguishes permanent insurance from every market-based accumulation vehicle.
Base policy premium represents the scheduled, level payment required to keep guaranteed death benefit in force and build guaranteed cash value according to contract specifications. This amount is typically calculated to maintain the policy to age 100 or 121 depending on mortality tables and policy design. Paying only base premium with no additional paid-up additions would result in a traditionally designed whole life policy focused primarily on death benefit with modest cash value accumulation.
In infinite banking implementations, the base policy might represent only 20-40% of total premium commitment. If you’re directing $50,000 annually into your banking system, perhaps $12,000-$15,000 funds the base whole life policy while $35,000-$38,000 flows into paid-up additions riders. The base provides foundation; PUAs provide acceleration.
This allocation confuses people accustomed to traditional insurance where base premium represents the entire commitment. Why not make the base policy larger and minimize PUA allocations? Because PUA dollars convert to accessible cash value far more efficiently than base policy dollars—often 90-95% cash value conversion in year one for PUA allocations versus 40-60% for base allocations.
The relationship between base and PUA riders isn’t optional or arbitrary. PUA riders must attach to base policies—they cannot exist independently. The base establishes the contract; PUAs enhance it. Think of the base as your home’s foundation—essential but relatively small compared to the total structure built on top.
Base policy face amount refers to the initial death benefit established at policy issue. This amount appears on the policy face page and represents minimum guaranteed death benefit the company promises (assuming premiums are paid). As paid-up additions accumulate through dividend purchases and PUA rider contributions, total death benefit grows substantially beyond base face amount.
Example: $500,000 base face amount might grow to $2.5 million total death benefit after 30 years of PUA accumulation. The $500,000 base never changes. The additional $2 million came from paid-up additions purchased over decades. Both components together create total death benefit beneficiaries would receive.
Policy illustrations show both guaranteed values (reflecting only base policy performance with zero dividends) and illustrated values (showing base policy plus projected dividend performance). The gap between these columns demonstrates dividend impact. When evaluating policies, examine both: guaranteed columns show worst-case scenarios while illustrated columns show probable outcomes based on current company performance.
Some people wonder whether they can minimize base policy to absolute minimum and maximize PUA allocations. Companies limit how small base policies can be relative to total premium because: tax law (IRC Section 7702) requires minimum death benefit relative to premium and cash value, insurance company underwriting (they won’t issue policies with extreme imbalances between base and riders), and structural integrity (the base must be substantial enough to support rider attachments).
Proper policy design finds the optimal balance: base policy large enough to satisfy tax law, support desired PUA funding, and provide meaningful guaranteed foundation, but no larger than necessary because excess base premium reduces efficiency. This optimization requires expertise in infinite banking design, not just general insurance knowledge.
Blended Policy Design: Optimizing Efficiency
A blended policy combines base whole life insurance with term insurance riders and maximum paid-up additions funding, creating optimized structure for infinite banking that accelerates cash value accumulation while maintaining tax compliance and cost efficiency. Understanding blended design explains why properly structured infinite banking policies look dramatically different from traditional whole life insurance.
The “blend” refers to mixing three distinct components for specific strategic purposes: modest base whole life death benefit (providing guaranteed foundation and permanent policy structure while minimizing insurance costs that don’t build cash value), term insurance riders (increasing total death benefit to support higher MEC-compliant premium limits without proportional whole life premium increases), and aggressive PUA funding (directing maximum dollars into cash value accumulation at 90-95% first-year efficiency).
Why blending works becomes clear by examining component economics. Pure whole life policies without term riders require substantial premium just for the permanent death benefit, leaving limited allocation for PUA cash value building. The insurance mortality costs consume too much of each premium dollar. Pure term insurance builds zero cash value—it’s rental coverage expiring worthless if you outlive the term. Blending creates optimal compromise: enough permanent whole life to establish tax-advantaged structure, enough term insurance to support MEC-compliant funding without excessive permanent insurance costs, and maximum PUA allocation accelerating cash value growth.
Example structure for a 40-year-old targeting $50,000 annual premium: Base whole life policy provides $300,000 death benefit requiring $12,000 annual premium. Term rider adds $700,000 death benefit costing $1,500 annual premium. PUA rider receives $36,500 annual premium. Total death benefit: $1 million. Total premium: $50,000 annually. The $1 million death benefit supports the $50,000 annual premium under IRS Modified Endowment Contract testing. The $36,500 PUA allocation creates rapid cash value accumulation at high efficiency. The term rider provides family protection and MEC compliance at minimal cost.
The term rider graduation strategy recognizes that term components become less necessary as the policy matures. In early years, the term rider serves dual purposes: providing family death benefit protection when dependents need it most, and supporting MEC limits allowing maximum PUA funding. After 15-20 years of PUA accumulation, the whole life death benefit plus accumulated PUA death benefit often exceeds original term rider amounts. Family protection needs typically decrease as children become independent and mortgages get paid. The term rider can expire without renewal, simplifying the policy structure and eliminating the rider cost.
Cost efficiency advantages of blended designs compared to pure whole life become substantial. Blended policies achieve better cash value per premium dollar because term insurance provides needed death benefit far cheaper than equivalent whole life coverage, freeing more premium for PUA funding. PUA allocations generate immediate high cash value—90-95% of PUA premium becomes accessible within first year. Total insurance costs as percentage of premium decrease over time as PUA death benefit grows, reducing the at-risk amount the company insures.
Not all insurance companies offer term riders compatible with blended designs. Not all agents understand how to structure properly. Companies like Penn Mutual, Ohio National, and Mass Mutual have become particularly associated with blended policy designs because their product structures, available riders, and underwriting philosophies support this approach effectively. Working with agents specializing in infinite banking rather than generalist insurance agents matters enormously for accessing these design capabilities.
Policy illustrations for blended designs show complexity requiring interpretation. The illustration displays three separate components (base policy values, term rider costs and death benefit, PUA rider contributions and resulting values) plus combined totals. For consumers unfamiliar with policy architecture, this creates confusion—it appears you’re looking at three separate policies rather than one integrated design. The combined columns showing total death benefit and total cash value represent what actually matters for evaluation.
Flexibility advantages emerge from blended structures. During high-income years, you can maximize PUA funding. During lean periods, you can reduce or eliminate PUA premium while maintaining base policy and term rider. If term coverage becomes unnecessary, you let it lapse or choose not to renew. This adaptability helps policies accommodate real-world circumstances across 40-50 year implementations.
Critics viewing blended policies as unnecessarily complex compared to simple whole life designs miss the entire point. Blending optimizes efficiency for infinite banking purposes—rapid cash value accumulation with cost-effective death benefit. The complexity serves function, not confusion. A Formula 1 race car is more complex than a basic sedan, but the complexity enables performance impossible in simpler designs.
Death Benefit: The Component That Makes Everything Work
Death benefit represents the amount paid to designated beneficiaries when you die—the core insurance protection component in any life insurance policy. For infinite banking focused on living benefits through cash value access, understanding death benefit’s role requires recognizing it serves three critical functions: creating the favorable tax treatment making the entire strategy viable, providing legacy wealth transfer capabilities, and offering financial protection during working years when dependents rely on your income.
The tax law connection runs deep. What defines a product as “life insurance” for tax purposes? Meaningful death benefit relative to cash value and premiums paid. Internal Revenue Code Section 7702 establishes tests ensuring products receiving life insurance tax benefits maintain genuine insurance character rather than becoming investment vehicles with nominal coverage attached. Without the death benefit component, you’d have a taxable investment account, not tax-advantaged life insurance enabling infinite banking.
This means the death benefit isn’t a “cost” or “waste” in infinite banking policies—it’s the feature creating tax-deferred growth, tax-free policy loans, and tax-free transfer to heirs. The death benefit is what makes whole life insurance different from and superior to taxable brokerage accounts for infinite banking purposes. You’re not paying extra for something you don’t need. You’re purchasing the tax treatment enabling everything else to work.
How death benefit actually functions: When you die, the insurance company pays beneficiaries the policy’s death benefit amount, typically within 30 days of receiving valid death claim and documentation. Beneficiaries receive this payment income-tax-free under current tax law—one of the most powerful tax advantages in the entire code. A $2 million death benefit transfers to heirs as $2 million, not as $1.4 million after taxes like most other assets generating ordinary income or even capital gains.
The death benefit includes your cash value, not in addition to it. Many people misunderstand this critical point, believing they “lose” cash value at death with beneficiaries receiving only death benefit. This is incorrect. The death benefit includes cash value plus the at-risk insurance amount. If your policy has $1.5 million death benefit and $800,000 cash value, beneficiaries receive $1.5 million total (the full death benefit), not $1.5 million plus the $800,000 cash value separately. Cash value is already part of the death benefit, not additional to it.
Death benefit growth over time in infinite banking policies with significant paid-up additions becomes substantial. You might start with $500,000 death benefit at issue. After 20 years of consistent premium payments and dividend purchases of PUAs, death benefit might reach $1.2 million. After 40 years, potentially $3 million or more. This growth happens automatically as cash value and PUAs accumulate, creating increasing legacy value alongside increasing living benefits.
Outstanding policy loans affect death benefit at death. If you have loans outstanding when you die, the insurance company deducts the loan balance plus accrued interest from death benefit before paying beneficiaries. Example: $2 million death benefit with $400,000 in outstanding policy loans results in $1.6 million paid to beneficiaries. This reduction is automatic—beneficiaries don’t “inherit” the debt requiring repayment. The insurance company simply nets the obligation before distributing proceeds.
The tax-free transfer advantage creates powerful estate planning benefits. Death benefit passes to beneficiaries income-tax-free under Section 101(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. This treatment applies regardless of how much death benefit exceeds premiums paid. You could pay $500,000 in total premiums over your lifetime and transfer $3 million tax-free to heirs through the death benefit. No other financial vehicle provides this combination of tax-deferred growth during life plus tax-free transfer at death without contribution limits or income restrictions.
Estate tax considerations operate separately from income tax. While death benefits avoid income tax, they may be included in your taxable estate for estate tax purposes if you own the policy. For estates exceeding federal exemption limits (currently around $13 million per individual), this inclusion could trigger 40% estate taxes. High-net-worth individuals often use irrevocable life insurance trusts owning policies outside their taxable estates, preserving income-tax-free benefits while avoiding estate taxation.
Some people view death benefit as unnecessary expense in infinite banking policies focused on cash value access. This perspective fundamentally misunderstands the economics. You’re not paying extra for death benefit. The death benefit is what creates tax advantages. Without it, you’d have a taxable investment earning taxable returns with taxable access. The death benefit “cost” is actually the fee you pay for permanent tax advantages, and it’s extraordinarily efficient compared to tax savings generated over decades.
For people wondering whether infinite banking locks up money, understanding death benefit mechanics clarifies that capital isn’t trapped—it’s accessible through policy loans during life while simultaneously creating tax-free wealth transfer at death. This dual functionality makes whole life insurance unique among asset classes.
Term Rider: Strategic Death Benefit Enhancement
A term rider is an optional policy attachment providing temporary death benefit protection for a specified period (typically 10, 20, or 30 years) at a fraction of permanent whole life insurance costs. In infinite banking policy design, term riders serve specific strategic purposes: maximizing death benefit to pass Modified Endowment Contract testing while minimizing premium devoted to permanent insurance costs, and providing additional family protection during high-need years without derailing cash value accumulation.
Term riders attached to whole life policies function identically to standalone term insurance—they provide pure death benefit protection with no cash value component. The critical difference: when attached to permanent policies, term riders help structure premium payments more efficiently for infinite banking purposes while simultaneously providing family protection precisely when dependents need it most.
The MEC management application demonstrates the rider’s strategic value. IRS testing for Modified Endowment Contract status requires minimum death benefit relative to premium paid. If you want to maximize premium payments accelerating cash value growth, you need proportionally higher death benefit. Adding a term rider increases total death benefit without requiring additional whole life premium, effectively raising your MEC limit and allowing more cash value funding through paid-up additions.
Example: You’re 45 years old wanting to direct $75,000 annually into a policy. A whole life base policy with $500,000 death benefit might only support $40,000 annual premium before hitting MEC limits. By adding a $500,000 term rider, total death benefit becomes $1 million, raising the MEC threshold to allow the full $75,000 premium without MEC classification. The term rider costs perhaps $1,200 annually—a small investment enabling $35,000 in additional PUA funding.
The temporary family protection strategy addresses a common situation young families implementing infinite banking face: dual objectives of building cash value for long-term financial independence while protecting income during child-raising years when family responsibilities create maximum protection needs. A modest whole life base policy ($250,000) with maximum PUA funding creates strong cash value accumulation. Adding a $750,000 term rider provides $1 million total protection during the 15-25 years when children are dependent and mortgages are large. As the term rider expires, children have become financially independent, mortgages are paid or reduced, and the permanent whole life policy has accumulated substantial cash value for infinite banking purposes.
Cost considerations make term riders attractive additions. A $500,000 term rider might cost $800-$2,000 annually depending on age, health, and term length—dramatically less than equivalent permanent whole life coverage requiring perhaps $15,000-$25,000 in additional annual premium. This efficiency allows you to maximize death benefit for MEC purposes and family protection without proportionally increasing total premium commitment.
Renewal and conversion provisions in term riders provide future flexibility. Most term riders include options to renew at the end of the term period at higher age-based rates, or convert to additional whole life coverage (sometimes requiring underwriting, sometimes guaranteed). These provisions create opportunities if circumstances change. If your health deteriorates during the term period, conversion rights become valuable, allowing you to add permanent coverage that might otherwise be unavailable or prohibitively expensive at older ages with health challenges.
The declining need perspective aligns term rider structures with typical financial planning patterns. Financial theory suggests death benefit needs decline over time as dependents become independent, mortgages get paid, and assets accumulate. Term riders align with this model: high protection when needs are greatest, expiring when needs diminish. The permanent whole life base with growing cash value provides the opposite pattern: increasing value over time for legacy planning and infinite banking capital.
Term riders provide death benefit but generate no cash value, meaning they don’t increase borrowing capacity. If you take policy loans against the whole life portion of your policy, the term rider death benefit remains separate. Upon death with outstanding loans, the insurance company deducts loans from total death benefit (whole life plus term rider combined), reducing what beneficiaries receive from both components.
Strategic removal timing requires assessment as term riders approach expiration or renewal points. By the time term riders expire (often 15-25 years into the policy), your whole life death benefit has likely grown substantially through paid-up additions accumulation. You might have started with $500,000 base plus $700,000 term ($1.2 million total). After 20 years, accumulated PUA death benefit might be $700,000, creating $1.2 million permanent coverage ($500,000 base + $700,000 PUA). The expiring term rider becomes redundant. Let it lapse and redirect any premium toward additional PUAs or other financial objectives.
Common misconception treats term riders as unnecessary expenses in infinite banking policies, arguing death benefit should come entirely from cash value accumulation. This perspective ignores the MEC management value and practical reality that young families often need more protection than cash value alone provides in early years. Term riders solve both problems efficiently: supporting maximum PUA funding through higher MEC limits while providing family protection at minimal cost.
Waiver of Premium Rider: Protecting Your System
Waiver of premium rider is a policy provision automatically continuing your life insurance premiums if you become totally disabled, keeping your policy in force and accumulating cash value without requiring payments from you during disability periods. This protection ensures temporary or permanent disability doesn’t destroy decades of infinite banking system development, preserving your financial foundation precisely when you need it most.
The waiver rider functions as disability insurance specifically for your life insurance premiums. If you meet the rider’s definition of total disability (typically unable to perform your occupation for a specified period, often 6 months), the insurance company begins paying your scheduled premiums on your behalf. Your whole life policy continues exactly as if you were making payments yourself: death benefit remains in force, cash value accumulates according to schedule, dividends credit normally, and paid-up additions purchase from dividends and any scheduled PUA rider premium the waiver covers.
How the mechanics work: You become disabled and unable to work. After satisfying the waiting period (typically 90-180 days depending on rider terms), you submit medical documentation proving total disability. The insurance company approves the waiver claim. They begin paying your base policy premium and any scheduled paid-up additions rider premium the waiver covers. These payments continue as long as you remain totally disabled under the rider definition, potentially for decades if disability proves permanent. Your policy accumulates value as if nothing changed, but you’re not paying premiums from your now-reduced income.
The infinite banking protection becomes critical when you consider the alternative. Building a personal banking system assumes decades of consistent premium payments. Disability can devastate this timeline—precisely when you need financial resources most (medical expenses, income replacement, business challenges), you might be forced to stop funding your primary financial vehicle. Waiver of premium prevents this catastrophic scenario. Your cash value continues growing, providing accessible capital through policy loans to help manage disability-related expenses while maintaining the long-term banking system you’ve spent years building.
Cost and underwriting for waiver riders typically runs 2-5% of annual premium, varying by age, occupation, and the specific disability definition in the rider. Some riders use favorable “own occupation” definitions (you’re considered disabled if unable to perform your specific job even if you could work in other capacities). Others use more restrictive “any occupation” definitions (you’re only considered disabled if unable to perform any job for which you’re reasonably qualified). Underwriting for waiver riders can be more stringent than for base life insurance because disability claims occur more frequently than early death claims, creating higher risk for insurance companies.
Waiting periods and benefit periods affect rider value. Most waiver riders include waiting periods (3-6 months) before benefits begin, meaning you need to cover premiums yourself during initial disability months. The benefit period defines how long the waiver continues—some riders pay benefits only until age 65, while others continue for life if disability is permanent. For infinite banking purposes, riders paying until age 65 or beyond are preferable because they protect the full premium commitment period you’d planned for your banking system.
PUA rider coverage creates an important distinction many people overlook. Standard waiver riders cover base policy premium automatically. However, if most of your annual commitment flows into paid-up additions riders (common in infinite banking designs where PUA premium might be 60-80% of total payment), you must ensure the waiver covers PUA premiums too. Some riders only waive base premium, leaving you responsible for PUA payments during disability—potentially forcing you to stop the cash value acceleration that makes infinite banking efficient. When evaluating waiver riders for infinite banking policies, confirm PUA premium coverage explicitly.
Interaction with other disability coverage is important to understand. Waiver of premium supplements but doesn’t replace comprehensive disability insurance covering living expenses. If you become disabled, individual or group disability insurance replaces income for mortgage, food, utilities, and other living costs. Waiver of premium specifically protects your life insurance premiums, ensuring your banking system continues building. Both serve different but complementary purposes in complete financial planning.
Common misconception assumes waiver riders are unnecessary because “I can just use automatic premium loan if I become disabled.” While automatic premium loan provides backup if you can’t pay premiums, it accumulates loans during disability that compound over potentially decades. If you’re disabled for 20 years, APL might create $500,000+ in policy loans consuming much of your cash value. Waiver of premium actually pays your premiums without creating policy debt, preserving full cash value growth and borrowing capacity for managing the disability itself rather than merely keeping the policy afloat while accumulating massive loan balances.
Integration: How Design Components Create Systems
These five policy design elements don’t operate independently—they integrate into comprehensive systems creating results impossible through any single component alone.
The base policy provides guaranteed foundation and permanent structure required for tax qualification and contractual certainty. Blended design optimizes efficiency by mixing base whole life, term insurance, and maximum PUA allocations to accelerate cash value while maintaining cost effectiveness. Death benefit creates the tax advantages making infinite banking viable—without it, you’d have taxable investments, not tax-advantaged banking systems. Term riders enhance death benefit cost-effectively, supporting higher MEC limits and family protection without excessive permanent insurance costs. Waiver of premium protects the entire structure during disability, ensuring temporary health challenges don’t destroy decades of system building.
Properly designed policies integrate these components precisely: base whole life sized appropriately for guaranteed foundation without excess permanent insurance costs, PUA riders maximized within MEC limits for rapid cash value accumulation, term riders added strategically when they enhance MEC compliance or family protection efficiency, and waiver of premium elected to protect against disability derailing the system.
Improperly designed policies make critical errors: base policies too large relative to PUA allocations (traditional insurance design optimizing death benefit instead of cash value), insufficient PUA funding leaving cash value accumulation far below potential, missing or undersized term riders creating MEC constraint problems or insufficient family protection, and waiver riders not covering PUA premiums, leaving the acceleration component vulnerable during disability.
The difference compounds over decades. Two $50,000 annual premium commitments to the same company with similar health ratings can produce $300,000+ differences in accessible cash value after 20 years purely due to design optimization. The properly designed policy has $675,000 accessible cash value on $1,000,000 in premiums paid. The poorly designed policy has $425,000 accessible cash value on the same premiums. Both fulfill contractual obligations. Both will eventually accumulate value. But one creates an operational banking system years earlier, with hundreds of thousands more capital available for deployment.
This is why working with advisors who specialize in infinite banking design rather than generalist insurance agents matters enormously. General agents design policies the way they’ve always designed them—optimize death benefit per premium dollar, minimize cash value components, and sell based on protection needs. Infinite banking specialists design policies specifically for cash value acceleration, tax efficiency, and capital deployment—fundamentally different objectives requiring fundamentally different policy architecture.
We work with clients earning $250,000+ annually, holding $50,000 or more in liquid capital, with the capacity to fund $1,000 to $10,000 or more monthly. If that describes your circumstances and you’re prepared to make a decision within 30 days, reach out at jib@theinfinitebanker.com to schedule a Discovery call.
Invitation to inquire: The information provided is an invitation to inquire about our services and is not an offer to sell insurance or securities.
Renewal, cancellation, termination: Policies require ongoing premium payments. Non-payment may result in lapse or termination. Surrendering a policy may result in fees and tax consequences.
Licensing scope: We are licensed insurance professionals. We do not provide legal, tax, or investment advice. Consult your advisors.
Loans reduce cash value and death benefit: Outstanding loans and interest reduce available cash value and death benefit. Loans are not required to be repaid during the insured’s lifetime, but unpaid loans will reduce death benefit.
Comparisons are educational: Any comparisons to other financial products are for educational purposes only and are not guarantees of performance.
“Infinite Banking Concept®” is a registered trademark of Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC. The Infinite Banker is independent: We are not affiliated with or endorsed by Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC.